<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>astrophysics &amp;mdash; CosmoPhys</title>
    <link>https://cosmophys.writeas.com/tag:astrophysics</link>
    <description>Primarily About Cosmology and Astrophysics</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 02:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
    <item>
      <title>Searchable Lists of Astro2020 Decadal Survey Papers</title>
      <link>https://cosmophys.writeas.com/searchable-lists-of-astro2020-decadal-survey-papers?pk_campaign=rss-feed</link>
      <description>&lt;![CDATA[Two sets of White Paper submissions, Science and APCsup1/sup, are available in response to the Astro2020 Decadal Survey.  CSV files of info on them are available at that site. I took those source files and created searchable HTML pages with links to the PDF files for each paper. What&#39;s searchable is the paper title, the principal author and their institution, a short description of the paper, and (for the Science White Papers) the NASA ADS Bibcode record. The ADS data was extracted from an AAS Bulletin. &#xA;&#xA;Each of the two searchable webpages has a link to the other, as well as to the source data. The webpages are self-contained with all the data included in the html file, which contains the javascript code for the searches and the CSS for styling.&#xA;&#xA;The original purpose in doing this was because many of the submissions were not on the arXiv, and I wanted to see what else was available and also so the PDF file link were all on one page. In addition, though, the search feature has been very useful.!--more--&#xA;&#xA;The webpages are coded with simple html and javascript (javascript must be enabled to view the data). The webpage search input box shows the syntax:&#xA;&#xA;Use \ for AND search, : keyword1keyword2&#xA;&#xA;Use | for OR search: keyword1|keyword2&#xA;&#xA;For NOT, use -- (2 hyphens) after 1st keyword: keyword1--keyword2&#xA;&#xA;sup1/supAPC: Activity, Project, or State of the Profession Consideration&#xA;&#xA;HashTags: #astrophysics #cosmology #physics]]&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two sets of White Paper submissions, Science and APC<sup>1</sup>, are available in response to the <a href="https://sites.nationalacademies.org/DEPS/Astro2020/DEPS_192906" rel="nofollow">Astro2020 Decadal Survey</a>.  CSV files of info on them are available at that site. I took those source files and created <a href="https://jermity.gitlab.io/samples/astro2020_papers.html" rel="nofollow">searchable HTML pages</a> with links to the PDF files for each paper. What&#39;s searchable is the paper title, the principal author and their institution, a short description of the paper, and (for the Science White Papers) the NASA ADS Bibcode record. The ADS data was extracted from an <a href="https://baas.aas.org/community/astro2020-science-white-papers/" rel="nofollow">AAS Bulletin</a>.</p>

<p>Each of the two searchable webpages has a link to the other, as well as to the source data. The webpages are self-contained with all the data included in the html file, which contains the javascript code for the searches and the CSS for styling.</p>

<p>The original purpose in doing this was because many of the submissions were not on <a href="https://www.arxiv.org" rel="nofollow">the arXiv</a>, and I wanted to see what else was available and also so the PDF file link were all on one page. In addition, though, the search feature has been very useful.</p>

<p>The webpages are coded with simple html and javascript (javascript must be enabled to view the data). The webpage search input box shows the syntax:</p>

<p>Use * for AND search, : keyword1*keyword2</p>

<p>Use | for OR search: keyword1|keyword2</p>

<p>For NOT, use — (2 hyphens) after 1st keyword: keyword1—keyword2</p>

<p><sup>1</sup>APC: Activity, Project, or State of the Profession Consideration</p>

<p>HashTags: <a href="https://cosmophys.writeas.com/tag:astrophysics" class="hashtag" rel="nofollow"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">astrophysics</span></a> <a href="https://cosmophys.writeas.com/tag:cosmology" class="hashtag" rel="nofollow"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">cosmology</span></a> <a href="https://cosmophys.writeas.com/tag:physics" class="hashtag" rel="nofollow"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">physics</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <guid>https://cosmophys.writeas.com/searchable-lists-of-astro2020-decadal-survey-papers</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2020 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>H_0 Measurements by the H0LiCOW Collaboration</title>
      <link>https://cosmophys.writeas.com/h_0-measurements-by-the-h0licow-collaboration?pk_campaign=rss-feed</link>
      <description>&lt;![CDATA[New developments since this post was originally created: videos of presentations at the KITP-UCSB conference Tensions between the Early and the Late Universe in mid-July 2019: (1) Tomasso Treu presentation: Time delay cosmography and the Hubble constant tension, and (2) [&#xA;Anowar J. Shajib](http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~ajshajib/) presentation: Towards a 1% Hubble constant measurement with time delay cosmography.&#xA;\__!--more--&#xA;&#xA;Subject paper: a href=&#34;https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.04869&#34;[1907.04869] H0LiCOW XIII. A 2.4% measurement of $H\0$ from lensed quasars: 5.3σ tension between early and late-Universe probes/a  &#xA;&#xA;This full report by the H0LiCOW collaborationsup1/sup follows after their recent 5th (1905.09338) and 6th (1907.02533)sup2/sup measurements based on a time-delay strong lensing technique. The 4th measurement was reported in September 2018 (1809.01274) and was the subject of a cosmology subreddit thread at that time.&#xA;&#xA;From this paper&#39;s Summary section: &#34;Our constraint on H\0 in flat ΛCDM is completely independent of and complementary to the latest results from the SH0ES collaboration, so these two measurements can be combined into a late-Universe constraint on H\0. Together, these are in tension with the best early-Universe (i.e., CMB) determination of H\0 from Planck at a significance of 5.3σ.&#34;&#xA;&#xA;Here are some examples of the enthusiastic reaction within the SH0ES team to these new results: Ex 1 and Ex 2.&#xA;&#xA;For a summary overview of this technique, besides what&#39;s in the papers, see &#39;H\0 via standard clocks&#39;, Section 3, in 1903.05035.  There&#39;s also an astrobites article on using strong gravitational lensing to measure H\0.&#xA;&#xA;At a 3-day KITP-UCSB conference starting July 15, 2019, one of the topics presented was Tensions between the Early and the Late Universe by H0LiCOW team member Tommaso Treu: &#39;Time delay cosmography and the Hubble constant tension&#39; [video of talk]. Also, the lead author of the 6th paper, Geoff Chi-Fan Chen sup3/sup attended. Conference attendees tweeted highlights and visuals under the KITPH0tTakes hashtag. &#xA;&#xA;Here is a link to Figure 12 from this paper.&#xA;&#xA;A list of papers on the arXiv with H0LiCOW in the title or abstract.&#xA;&#xA;\_&#xA;Footnotes:&#xA;sup1/sup They have a web site here but at this time it hasn&#39;t been updated for these latest results.&#xA;sup2/sup Also see this Astrobites article about the 6th measurement paper [1907.02533]. This is the one where they used adaptive-optics imaging from Keck and compared it with data from HST.&#xA;sup3/sup Geoff Chi-Fan Chen&#39;s personal website about his research work  &#xA;&#xA;Note: This note is based on my cosmology subreddit post on this paper.  &#xA;&#xA;Tags: #astrophysics #cosmology #H0]]&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New developments since this post was originally created: videos of presentations at the KITP-UCSB conference <a href="http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/enervac-c19/" rel="nofollow">Tensions between the Early and the Late Universe</a> in mid-July 2019: (1) <a href="http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~tt/Welcome.html" rel="nofollow">Tomasso Treu</a> presentation: <a href="http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/enervac-c19/treu/" rel="nofollow">Time delay cosmography and the Hubble constant tension</a>, and (2) <a href="http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~ajshajib/" rel="nofollow">
Anowar J. Shajib</a> presentation: <a href="http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/enervac-c19/shajib/" rel="nofollow">Towards a 1% Hubble constant measurement with time delay cosmography</a>.
___</p>

<p>Subject paper: <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.04869" rel="nofollow">[1907.04869] H0LiCOW XIII. A 2.4% measurement of $H_0$ from lensed quasars: 5.3σ tension between early and late-Universe probes</a></p>

<p>This full report by the H0LiCOW collaboration<sup>1</sup> follows after their recent 5th (<a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.09338" rel="nofollow">1905.09338</a>) and 6th (<a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.02533" rel="nofollow">1907.02533</a>)<sup>2</sup> measurements based on a time-delay strong lensing technique. The 4th measurement was reported in September 2018 (<a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.01274" rel="nofollow">1809.01274</a>) and was the subject of <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/cosmology/comments/9dl31p/combined_timedelay_strong_lensing_tdsl_results/?sort=top" rel="nofollow">a cosmology subreddit thread</a> at that time.</p>

<p>From this paper&#39;s Summary section: “Our constraint on H_0 in flat ΛCDM is completely independent of and complementary to the latest results from the SH0ES collaboration, so these two measurements can be combined into a late-Universe constraint on H_0. Together, these are in tension with the best early-Universe (i.e., CMB) determination of H_0 from Planck at a significance of 5.3σ.”</p>

<p>Here are some examples of the enthusiastic reaction within the SH0ES team to these new results: <a href="https://twitter.com/DScol/status/1149495277859958785" rel="nofollow">Ex 1</a> and <a href="https://twitter.com/DScol/status/1148037144180613120" rel="nofollow">Ex 2</a>.</p>

<p>For a summary overview of this technique, besides what&#39;s in the papers, see &#39;H_0 via standard clocks&#39;, Section 3, in <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.05035" rel="nofollow">1903.05035</a>.  There&#39;s also an <a href="https://astrobites.org/2018/01/22/time-delay-lens-modeling-challenge/" rel="nofollow">astrobites article on using strong gravitational lensing to measure H_0</a>.</p>

<p>At a 3-day KITP-UCSB conference starting July 15, 2019, one of the topics presented was <a href="https://www.kitp.ucsb.edu/activities/enervac-c19#schedule" rel="nofollow">Tensions between the Early and the Late Universe</a> by H0LiCOW team member <a href="http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~tt/Welcome.html" rel="nofollow">Tommaso Treu</a>: &#39;Time delay cosmography and the Hubble constant tension&#39; <a href="http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/enervac-c19/treu/" rel="nofollow">[video of talk]</a>. Also, the lead author of the 6th paper, <a href="https://twitter.com/GCFChen/" rel="nofollow">Geoff Chi-Fan Chen </a><sup>3</sup> attended. Conference attendees tweeted highlights and visuals under the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/kitp_h0ttakes?f=tweets&amp;vertical=default&amp;src=hash" rel="nofollow">KITP_H0tTakes hashtag</a>.</p>

<p>Here is a <a href="https://imgur.com/a/F1FI6fY" rel="nofollow">link to Figure 12</a> from this paper.</p>

<p>A list of <a href="https://arxiv.org/search/advanced?advanced=&amp;terms-0-operator=AND&amp;terms-0-term=H0LiCOW&amp;terms-0-field=title&amp;terms-1-operator=OR&amp;terms-1-term=H0LiCOW&amp;terms-1-field=abstract&amp;classification-physics=y&amp;classification-physics_archives=all&amp;classification-include_cross_list=include&amp;date-filter_by=all_dates&amp;date-year=&amp;date-from_date=&amp;date-to_date=&amp;date-date_type=submitted_date&amp;abstracts=show&amp;size=50&amp;order=-announced_date_first" rel="nofollow">papers on the arXiv with H0LiCOW in the title or abstract</a>.</p>

<p>___
Footnotes:
<sup>1</sup> They have a <a href="https://shsuyu.github.io/H0LiCOW/site/" rel="nofollow">web site here</a> but at this time it hasn&#39;t been updated for these latest results.
<sup>2</sup> Also see this <a href="https://astrobites.org/2019/07/12/h0ly-cow-a-new-measurement-of-the-hubble-constant/" rel="nofollow">Astrobites article</a> about the <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.02533" rel="nofollow">6th measurement paper [1907.02533]</a>. This is the one where they used adaptive-optics imaging from Keck and compared it with data from HST.
<sup>3</sup> <a href="https://sites.google.com/view/gcfchen" rel="nofollow">Geoff Chi-Fan Chen&#39;s personal website about his research work</a></p>

<p>Note: This note is based on my <a href="https://old.reddit.com/r/cosmology/comments/ccb5wh/h0licow_xiii_a_24_measurement_of_h_0_from_lensed/" rel="nofollow">cosmology subreddit post</a> on this paper.</p>

<p>Tags: <a href="https://cosmophys.writeas.com/tag:astrophysics" class="hashtag" rel="nofollow"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">astrophysics</span></a> <a href="https://cosmophys.writeas.com/tag:cosmology" class="hashtag" rel="nofollow"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">cosmology</span></a> <a href="https://cosmophys.writeas.com/tag:H0" class="hashtag" rel="nofollow"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">H0</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <guid>https://cosmophys.writeas.com/h_0-measurements-by-the-h0licow-collaboration</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 19:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Type IA Supernovae are Excellent Standard Candles in the Near-Infrared</title>
      <link>https://cosmophys.writeas.com/type-ia-supernovae-are-excellent-standard-candles?pk_campaign=rss-feed</link>
      <description>&lt;![CDATA[This paper [arxiv: 1902.03261] is a current status review on improving systematicssup1/sup in SNe Ia distance measurements by combining optical with near-infrared (NIR) photometry). Though initially being done at low redshifts (z = 0.04), there are plans to extend this work to higher redshifts&lt;sup2/sup. The paper is authored by some of the more noted researchers in this area, e.g., Arturo Avelino and Robert Kirshnersup3/sup. My goal here is a top-level summary, so that if you don&#39;t read the paper you&#39;ll hopefully get the gist of it, while also including helpful supplemental info. In a few cases, I added some font bolding for emphasis.&#xA;&#xA;&#34;This is significant for supernova cosmology because, along with photometric-calibration uncertainties, uncertain dust extinction estimates and the intrinsic variability of SN Ia colors present challenging and important systematic problems for dark energy measurements. (pg2)&#34; &#xA;&#xA;&#34;Recent work has demonstrated that SN Ia in the NIR are more nearly standard candles, even before correction for light curve (LC) shape or host galaxy dust reddening... Overall, a substantial body of evidence indicates that rest-frame LCs of SN Ia in NIR are both better standard candles than at optical wavelengths and less sensitive to the confounding effects of dust. When NIR data are combined with UBV RI photometry, this yields accurate and precise distance estimates. (pg2)&#34; !--more--&#xA;&#xA;This study analyzed 89 SNe Ia having both optical and NIR data avaiable. &#34;While the current sample of optical SN Ia LCs exceeds 1000, and will be increased by orders of magnitude by ongoing and future surveys including the Dark Energy Survey, the Zwicky Transient Facility, and the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope, the number of normal SN Ia with published NIR LCs is still less than 250.&#34; (abstract)&#xA;&#xA;This growing NIR work is useful not only to help to standardize SNe Ia distance measurements, but also for Hubble constant estimates, &#34;and eventually, cosmological parameter estimates, when the nearby and high-z samplessup2/sup are combined as in the HST RAISINsup4/sup program.&#34; (pg3)  &#xA;&#xA;&#34;We implement two different methods to derive the distance modulus for each supernova from the NIR LCs. We call them the template method and the Gaussian-process method (GP). The GP method requires data near the NIR maximum for all NIR bands being used, while the template method works for arbitrarily sampled data, even if the LC is sparse near maximum. For this reason, we have more objects in the template method Hubble diagrams...At the ∼2.5-3.1σ level, that NIR SN Ia LCs at NIR maximum, without LC shape or dust corrections, are already better standard candles than optical-only SN Ia LCs ... that apply such corrections. (pg12)&#34; ... &#34;For all NIR band subsets, the GP (NIR max) method produces the smallest scatter. (pg19)&#34;&#xA;&#xA;These NIR studies &#34;could help to limit systematic galaxy distance errors that arise from the degeneracy between the intrinsic supernova colors and reddening of light by dust, that affects optical-only SN Ia cosmology...Studies combining NIR and optical SN Ia photometry have already shown that the addition of NIR data is an extremely promising way to break the degeneracy between intrinsic color and dust reddening, allowing distance estimates to become increasingly insensitive to the assumptions behind individual LC fitting models. (pg25)&#xA;&#xA;&#34;Upcoming missions that could exploit nearby NIR data as a low-z anchor include the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope, the NASA Wide-Field Infrared Survey Telescope, the European Space Agency’s EUCLID mission, as well as the NASA James Webb Space Telescope. (pg28)&#34;&#xA;&#xA;Another paper that might be of interest: Carnegie Supernova Project-II: The Near-infrared Spectroscopy Program&#xA;\_&#xA;&#xA;sup1/sup &#34;Systematic errors introduced by photometry, light curve fitters, and by dust extinction pose the limit of precision for today&#39;s large optical samples. Theory predicts and empirical evidence demonstrates that SN Ia are more nearly standard candles in infrared bands than in optical bands. Dust absorption is 3 times smaller in the near IR.&#34; [Kirshner source]&#xA;&#xA;sup2/sup  &#34;This investigation is for a low-z sample, but we are working to extend this technique to cosmologically-interesting distances with the Hubble Space Telescope. (pg 1)&#34;&#xA;&#xA;sup3/sup Both Adam Riess and Brian Schmidt were Kirshner&#39;s PhD students. [source]&#xA;&#xA;sup4/sup RAISIN: Tracers of cosmic expansion with SN IA in the IR (aside: what a convoluted acronym!)&#xA;&#xA;Tags: #astrophysics #cosmology]]&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This paper <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.03261" rel="nofollow">[arxiv: 1902.03261]</a> is a current status review on improving systematics<sup>1</sup> in SNe Ia distance measurements by combining optical with near-infrared (NIR) <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photometry_(astronomy)" rel="nofollow">photometry</a>. Though initially being done at low redshifts (z &lt;= 0.04), there are plans to extend this work to higher redshifts<sup>2</sup>. The paper is authored by some of the more noted researchers in this area, e.g., <a href="https://scholar.harvard.edu/arturo_avelino/home" rel="nofollow">Arturo Avelino</a> and <a href="https://astronomy.fas.harvard.edu/people/robert-p-kirshner" rel="nofollow">Robert Kirshner</a><sup>3</sup>. My goal here is a top-level summary, so that if you don&#39;t read the paper you&#39;ll hopefully get the gist of it, while also including helpful supplemental info. In a few cases, I added some font bolding for emphasis.</p>

<p>“This is significant for supernova cosmology because, along with photometric-calibration uncertainties, uncertain dust [extinction](<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extinction_(astronomy" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extinction_(astronomy</a>) estimates and the intrinsic variability of SN Ia colors present challenging and important systematic problems for dark energy measurements. (pg2)”</p>

<p>“Recent work has demonstrated that SN Ia in the NIR are more nearly standard candles, even before correction for <a href="https://astronomy.swin.edu.au/cosmos/T/Type+Ia+supernova+light+curves" rel="nofollow">light curve</a> (LC) shape or host galaxy dust reddening... Overall, a substantial body of evidence indicates that rest-frame LCs of SN Ia in NIR are <strong>both better standard candles than at optical wavelengths and less sensitive to the confounding effects of dust</strong>. When NIR data are combined with <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photometric_system" rel="nofollow">UBV RI photometry</a>, this yields accurate and precise distance estimates. (pg2)” </p>

<p>This study analyzed 89 SNe Ia having both optical and NIR data avaiable. “While the current sample of optical SN Ia LCs exceeds 1000, and will be increased by orders of magnitude by ongoing and future surveys including the Dark Energy Survey, the Zwicky Transient Facility, and the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope, the number of normal SN Ia with published NIR LCs is still less than 250.” (abstract)</p>

<p>This growing NIR work is useful not only to help to standardize SNe Ia distance measurements, but also for <strong>Hubble constant</strong> estimates, “and eventually, <strong>cosmological parameter estimates</strong>, when the nearby and high-z samples<sup>2</sup> are combined as in the HST RAISIN<sup>4</sup> program.” (pg3)</p>

<p>“We implement two different methods to derive the distance modulus for each supernova from the NIR LCs. We call them the template method and the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_process" rel="nofollow">Gaussian-process</a> method (GP). The GP method requires data near the NIR maximum for all NIR bands being used, while the template method works for arbitrarily sampled data, even if the LC is sparse near maximum. For this reason, we have more objects in the template method Hubble diagrams...At the ∼2.5-3.1σ level, that NIR SN Ia LCs at NIR maximum, without LC shape or dust corrections, are already better standard candles than optical-only SN Ia LCs ... that apply such corrections. (pg12)” ... “For all NIR band subsets, the GP (NIR max) method produces the smallest scatter. (pg19)”</p>

<p>These NIR studies “could help to limit systematic galaxy distance errors that arise from the degeneracy between the intrinsic supernova colors and reddening of light by dust, that affects optical-only SN Ia cosmology...Studies combining NIR and optical SN Ia photometry have already shown that the addition of NIR data is an extremely promising way to <strong>break the degeneracy between intrinsic color and dust reddening</strong>, allowing distance estimates to become increasingly insensitive to the assumptions behind individual LC fitting models. (pg25)</p>

<p>“Upcoming missions that could exploit nearby NIR data as a low-z anchor include the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope, the NASA Wide-Field Infrared Survey Telescope, the European Space Agency’s EUCLID mission, as well as the NASA James Webb Space Telescope. (pg28)”</p>

<p>Another paper that might be of interest: <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.08213" rel="nofollow">Carnegie Supernova Project-II: The Near-infrared Spectroscopy Program</a>
___</p>

<p><sup>1</sup> “Systematic errors introduced by photometry, light curve fitters, and by dust extinction pose the limit of precision for today&#39;s large optical samples. Theory predicts and empirical evidence demonstrates that SN Ia are more nearly standard candles in infrared bands than in optical bands. Dust absorption is 3 times smaller in the near IR.” <a href="https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/?#abs/2015hst..prop14216K" rel="nofollow">[Kirshner source]</a></p>

<p><sup>2</sup>  “This investigation is for a low-z sample, but we are working to extend this technique to cosmologically-interesting distances with the Hubble Space Telescope. (pg 1)”</p>

<p><sup>3</sup> Both Adam Riess and Brian Schmidt were Kirshner&#39;s PhD students. <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Kirshner" rel="nofollow">[source]</a></p>

<p><sup>4</sup> RAISIN: Tracers of cosmic expansion with <strong>SN IA</strong> in the <strong>IR</strong> (aside: what a convoluted acronym!)</p>

<p>Tags: <a href="https://cosmophys.writeas.com/tag:astrophysics" class="hashtag" rel="nofollow"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">astrophysics</span></a> <a href="https://cosmophys.writeas.com/tag:cosmology" class="hashtag" rel="nofollow"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">cosmology</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <guid>https://cosmophys.writeas.com/type-ia-supernovae-are-excellent-standard-candles</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 19:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cosmic Distance Ladder</title>
      <link>https://cosmophys.writeas.com/cosmic-distance-ladder?pk_campaign=rss-feed</link>
      <description>&lt;![CDATA[An excellent thread explaining the cosmic distance ladder with helpful graphics, by PhD candidate Sharan Banagiri: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1288230254151073792.html. The original source is from this tweet thread.&#xA;&#xA;Some infographics about the cosmic distance ladder:!--more--&#xA;&#xA;[graphic source (credit: Matt Perko) from a UCSB article The Standard Siren]  A graphic illustrating the technique of &#34;building up a distance ladder using a number of different techniques for various ranges.&#34;&#xA;&#xA;three-rung-distance-ladder The three rungs of the distance ladder, from a presentation by Stephen Feeney at the a href=&#34;https://indico.cern.ch/event/843270/timetable/#20191113&#34;Gravitational Wave Probes of Fundamental Physics (11-13 November 2019)/a conference. The slides of this talk (keynote file format) are available here.&#xA;&#xA;The graphic below is from page 49 of the paper a href=&#34;https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.01424&#34;A 2.4% Determination of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant [arxiv:1604.01424]/a!--more--&#xA;img src=&#34;https://i.snap.as/jkKtuur.png&#34; style=&#34;width:70%; height:70%; display:block; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto;&#34;&#xA;&#xA;Some articles about the cosmic distance ladder:&#xA;An IOP article on the cosmic distance ladder&#xA;Cosmology is in crisis about how to measure the universe, by Sarah Scoles&#xA;Why Cosmology’s Expanding Universe Controversy Is An Even Bigger Problem Than You Realize, by Ethan Siegel&#xA;Cosmic Distance Ladder article&#xA;&#xA;Other references:&#xA;Slides from a talk by Stefano Casertano: Gaia DR2 and beyond: contributions to the local distance  scale&#xA;Additional materials from the Oct. 2018 KICP workshop: The Future of Hsub0/sub: Crisis or Concordance&#xA;&#xA;Tags: #astrophysics #cosmology ]]&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An excellent thread explaining the cosmic distance ladder with helpful graphics, by PhD candidate Sharan Banagiri: <a href="https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1288230254151073792.html" rel="nofollow">https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1288230254151073792.html</a>. The original source is from this <a href="https://twitter.com/geodesicvoyager/status/1288230254151073792" rel="nofollow">tweet thread</a>.</p>

<p>Some infographics about the cosmic distance ladder:</p>

<p><img src="https://www.news.ucsb.edu/files/images/2019/distance-ladder.jpg" alt=""/>
<a href="https://www.news.ucsb.edu/2019/019393/standard-siren" rel="nofollow">[graphic source (credit: Matt Perko) from a UCSB article <em>The Standard Siren</em>]</a>  A graphic illustrating the technique of “building up a distance ladder using a number of different techniques for various ranges.”</p>

<p><img src="https://i.snap.as/a9cTNlw.jpg" alt="three-rung-distance-ladder"/> The three rungs of the distance ladder, from a presentation by <a href="http://zuserver2.star.ucl.ac.uk/~smf/" rel="nofollow">Stephen Feeney</a> at the <a href="https://indico.cern.ch/event/843270/timetable/#20191113" rel="nofollow">Gravitational Wave Probes of Fundamental Physics (11-13 November 2019)</a> conference. The slides of this talk (keynote file format) are available <a href="https://indico.cern.ch/event/843270/contributions/3625332/" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>

<p>The graphic below is from page 49 of the paper <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.01424" rel="nofollow">A 2.4% Determination of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant [arxiv:1604.01424]</a>
<img src="https://i.snap.as/jkKtuur.png" style="width:70%; height:70%; display:block; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto;"></p>

<p>Some articles about the cosmic distance ladder:
<a href="http://www.iop.org/resources/topic/archive/cosmic/" rel="nofollow">An IOP article on the cosmic distance ladder</a>
<a href="https://www.wired.com/story/cosmology-is-in-crisis-over-how-to-measure-the-universe/" rel="nofollow">Cosmology is in crisis about how to measure the universe</a>, by Sarah Scoles
<a href="https://medium.com/starts-with-a-bang/why-cosmologys-expanding-universe-controversy-is-an-even-bigger-problem-than-you-realize-eb09258879e1" rel="nofollow">Why Cosmology’s Expanding Universe Controversy Is An Even Bigger Problem Than You Realize</a>, by Ethan Siegel
<a href="http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/C/cosmic_distance_ladder.html" rel="nofollow">Cosmic Distance Ladder article</a></p>

<p>Other references:
Slides from a talk by Stefano Casertano: <a href="https://kicp-workshops.uchicago.edu/2018-LCDM/depot/talk-casertano-stefano.pdf" rel="nofollow">Gaia DR2 and beyond: contributions to the local distance  scale</a>
Additional materials from the Oct. 2018 <a href="http://kicp.uchicago.edu/" rel="nofollow">KICP</a> workshop: <a href="https://kicp-workshops.uchicago.edu/2018-LCDM/presentations.php" rel="nofollow">The Future of H<sub>0</sub>: Crisis or Concordance</a></p>

<p>Tags: <a href="https://cosmophys.writeas.com/tag:astrophysics" class="hashtag" rel="nofollow"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">astrophysics</span></a> <a href="https://cosmophys.writeas.com/tag:cosmology" class="hashtag" rel="nofollow"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">cosmology</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <guid>https://cosmophys.writeas.com/cosmic-distance-ladder</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2019 09:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>